Transvaginal Mesh Failure – October 2019 UPDATE!


Johnson & Johnson, facing potentially costly litigation over opioids and baby powder, has now agreed to pay $117 million to settle claims brought by dozens of states that said it deceptively marketed transvaginal pelvic mesh implants.

The settlement was announced last Thursday, with attorney generals from 41 states and the District of Columbia. Pelvic mesh products have been at the heart of roughly $8 billion in personal-injury settlements between several manufacturers and tens of thousands of women in the United States. Women have complained about intense pain and bleeding after receiving mesh implants. In some cases, women have had additional surgery to remove the implants — a procedure that can be fraught with its own problems.

About 25,000 U.S. women with complications have sued Johnson & Johnson, the company said. Those lawsuits aren’t affected by the settlement. The pelvic mesh deal does require the company to cease its claims that surgical technique can eliminate any risks, as well as to disclose a list of risks, including loss of sexual function, mesh eroding into the vagina and the possible need for corrective surgery. The settlement covers the District of Columbia and these states: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia and Wisconsin.

The settlement does not include California, which took Johnson & Johnson to court this summer. That state is seeking up to $800 million in damages over claims that Johnson & Johnson deceived tens of thousands of women and doctors about the benefits of pelvic mesh to treat both organ prolapse and incontinence. Testimony concluded last month, but the judge has not yet ruled. Shares of Johnson & Johnson have come under pressure this year from the mounting costs of litigation.

In August, a judge ordered the company to pay $572 million (later reduced by $107 million because of a miscalculation) to Oklahoma after finding that Johnson & Johnson intentionally played down the dangers of opioids while it oversold their benefits. Earlier this month a Philadelphia jury awarded $8 billion in punitive damages to a Maryland man who said he hadn’t been warned that the anti-psychotic drug Risperdal could cause enlarged breasts in boys. About 10,000 others have raised similar claims. 

(Updated October 25, 2019)



On July 13, 2011, the Food and Drug Administration issued a public health warning on complications associated with transvaginal mesh placement of surgical mesh for pelvic organ prolapsed (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI). The FDA issued a strongly worded report warning that: (i) Complications related to transvaginal mesh surgery are occurring at a significantly high rate; (ii) There is no evidence that transvaginal mesh repair is more effective than traditional non mesh repair or that it provides any added benefit; and (iii) Transvaginal mesh surgery exposes patients to greater risk than traditional non mesh repair. This is a change from what previous FDA reports. The update states that surgical mesh for TVM repair of POP is an area of “continuing serious concern.”


Transvaginal mesh (TVM) and sling devices are medical devices surgically implanted to repair and reinforce weakened or damaged vaginal tissue, and to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary continence (SUI). Surgical repair of SUI can be performed through a vaginal incision by placing a biologic or synthetic “sling” (e.g., surgical mesh) under the urethra to help prevent urinary loss during physical activity. Surgeons also use surgical mesh to augment transvaginal POP repairs. The placement of surgical mesh is intended to increase the longevity of POP repairs. The mesh devices are typically placed transvaginally but may also be placed through an incision in the abdomen.

Other FDA statements and findings released in the July 2011 update include:

  • 50% of women who have surgery to remove the TVM continue to have complications and side effects because the mesh is often completely absorbed making the mesh impossible to remove
  • Adverse effects continue despite removal of the mesh
  • As much as 10% of the mesh may erode within 12 months of surgery
  • Incontinence after TVM surgery is more recurrent than with traditional methods
  • There is a higher incidence of second surgery following a surgery to implant TVM than any other vaginal surgery
  • Complications associated with TVM are not experienced among patients who have traditional surgery


Complications include: recurrent urinary tract infections, yeast infections, Pudendal Neuralgia (including nerve damage and/or pain that radiates from the pelvis down the front of the legs), pelvic, abdominal and/or lower back pain, difficulty urinating, pain/burning with urination, issues with bowel movements, granulation tissue, abscesses, spotting, urinary leakage, bowel or bladder dysfunction, vaginal scarring, severe physical pain and altered pelvic anatomy, pain with intercourse, bleeding from mesh site, damage to nearby organs, urinary tract problems, recurrence of POP or SUI, mesh erosion into the vagina, bladder, intestines, and uterus, mesh shrinkage or contraction, mesh migration and mesh exposure. 

If you are having these symptoms, then you may also have the following, as a result of this defective mesh:

repeat surgery(s) to have the mesh repaired or removed, blood transfusions, IV therapy, drainage of hematomas and a significant decrease in the quality of life.


If you or a loved one has under gone a surgical procedure to treat POP or SUI and have suffered complications as a result of a transvaginal mesh or bladder sling implant, you may be entitled to legal compensation from the manufacturers of these defective products.

The lawyers of the firm Taylor Martino are ready to evaluate your claim and assist you in seeking compensation for your pain, suffering, and other physical injuries, the cost of restorative surgery as well as other financial difficulties, resulting from injuries caused by these defective products. Please call us for a free consultation and case evaluation.


The FDA’s oversight of medical devices has been called into question by auditors with the U.S. General Accounting Office. In 2009, federal auditors listed the FDA’s oversight of medical devices as a high-risk area warranting the attention of Congress.

The transvaginal mesh products received expedited approval from the FDA through a legal process called the 510(k) process. Considered by many to be a legal loophole, the FDA’s 510(k) process allows a manufacturer to certify that its product is substantially equivalent to another legally marketed product, avoiding the long pre-market approval process. Manufacturers of vaginal mesh products who take this route, avoid having to demonstrate the safety of their vaginal mesh products through clinical trials prior to their release on the market.


  • Johnson & Johnson (Ethicon): Prolene Mesh/Prolene Soft Mesh, Gynemesh, TVT, TVT-O, TVT-Secur, TVT Exact, TVT Abbrevo, Prolift, Prolift +M
  • American Medical Systems: Apogee, Perigee, SPARC, Mini-Arc Single Incision Sling, Mini-Arc Precise Sling, Monarc Subfascial Hammock, Elevate with IntePro Lite, In-Fast Ultra with IntePro Lite/Synthetic Mesh, BioArc SP, MiniArc Sling System, Lite Pelvic Floor Repair Kit
  • Boston Scientific: Pinnacle, Advantage, Obtryx, Lynx, Prefyx, Solyx, Posterior Uphold
  • Bard: Align, Avaulta Biosynthetic Support Systems, Avaulta Solo, Avaulta Plus Support Systems, Pelvicol, PelviLace, PelviSoft, Pelvitex, Ugytex, Uretex
  • Coloplast (includes Mentor’s mesh brands): ARIS TOT, NovaSilk
  • Caldera Medical: T-Sling, Desara
  • Cook Medical: Stratasis
  • Tyco Healthcare: IVS

To determine the manufacturer and type of transvaginal mesh you have, contact the hospital or physician’s office where your procedure was performed. The name of the mesh, catalog number, lot number and size should be recorded in your medical records.

Related Articles:

Related Posts

Leave a Reply

Recent Articles

Truck Accident Injuries – When to Call an Alabama Big Truck Accident Lawyer
April 5, 2023
Why Do Car Accidents Increase During The Holidays?
December 1, 2022
Don’t Ignore Your Pain After a Car Accident
October 12, 2022
Johnny Smith
Johnny Smith
21:19 10 Feb 22
When I met Ed Rowan, my family and I were in a dispute with a very large and nationally recognized company. From the... start, I could tell we were in good hands. His immediate grasp of the case, including the most minute details was refreshing. Within a few weeks, I found that skill and a good memory were only two of Ed’s attributes. He is also honest, hardworking, and extremely motivated to win. The successful resolution of our case far exceeded my expectations. Ed Rowan has proved himself to me. He will be my first call for any legal issues I have in the more
Noelle L.
Noelle L.
22:11 23 Jan 22
My family and I had a very positive experience with this law firm. Our attorney worked so hard on our behalf. We were... extremely happy with the outcome. I would highly recommend this firm to others that are looking for help. Thank you for making this a positive experience for us. We had other things to worry about. This firm took our legal worries away. Thank you, again, for your more
Jordan Davis
Jordan Davis
13:24 20 Aug 19
Love the whole legal team at Taylor Martino. They truly care about their clients. Would not go to any another Injury... Lawyer in Alabama!read more
Kiyyah Malik
Kiyyah Malik
19:09 13 Jun 19
Ben Kearns and the staff at Taylor Martino made a terrible situation (car accident) into a much simpler less stressful... process. I appreciate all the dedication and hard work. They are highly recommended in my book!read more
Shadow Yuuki
Shadow Yuuki
20:04 22 May 19
These guys are the best. If anyone needs a lawyer, they did what they said they where going to do and when they said... they going to do it i got everything i should have. They are the best lawyers in Mobileread more
21:34 20 May 19
I heard about Ed Rowan from my aunt and gave him a call. Ed Rowan got things done in a timely matter and Elizabeth... Wright was very helpful and quick to respond when I had any more
Tim Howard
Tim Howard
15:11 23 Sep 18
I highly recommend the firm as they took my case and settled it quickly. They took me in and treated me like family... from day one. They kept me informed throughout the process and never left me feeling uncomfortable. Ben and Jennifer went above and beyond what anyone would more
sree harsha sunkara
sree harsha sunkara
15:14 13 Apr 18
This was the best law firm I have ever experienced. All I did was just contacted them and they did the rest for me and... updated me every week about the work in process. They were so good and I highly recommend them in case of any accidentsread more
Alice Dobson
Alice Dobson
12:17 19 Oct 17
No one ever wants to find themselves in need of an attorney, however, if needed you should contact Taylor Martino. ... They all worked very hard on my case and got me a much bigger settlement than I ever expected. I hope to never be in need of a lawyer again but if I do, I'll be calling more
Laura V
Laura V
03:09 13 Oct 17
I had a family member use this firm a couple months ago and dealt with Richard Taylor. He was very professional and... compassionate. He went above and beyond to make sure my family was informed and felt confident in their situation. I would recommend this firm to anyone!read more
debra hadley
debra hadley
02:49 15 Dec 15
Ed Rowan was very knowledgeable, professional and truly cared about my case. He was diligent in pursuing my case as if... I was his only client. He kept me informed from the beginning to end and was always willing to listen and answer my questions.Give him a call he is more
Next Reviews