Jury Awards 3.35 million in Vaginal Mesh Case Against Johnson Johnson

(Feb. 26) A jury on Monday said Johnson & Johnson should pay a South Dakota woman $3.35 million for failing to adequately warn her doctor of the potential dangers of a vaginal mesh implant made by the company’s Ethicon subsidiary, and for misrepresenting the product in brochures.

It was the first verdict among some 1,800 vaginal mesh cases pending in New Jersey against Ethicon and J&J and could have an impact on thousands of lawsuits against other manufacturers of similar products.

The lawsuit, in state Superior Court in Atlantic City, New Jersey, was brought by Linda Gross, 47, of Watertown, South Dakota, in November 2008. It alleged that the Gyncare Prolift vaginal mesh was not safe and that J&J and Ethicon were liable, among other things, for “their defective design, manufacture, warnings and instructions.”

The Ethicon product, before being taken off the U.S. market last year, was used to treat pelvic organ collapse, a condition for which the plaintiff, a nurse, was treated in November 2008.

That condition occurs when tissue that holds the pelvic organs in place is weak or stretched and bulges into the vagina. There are different types of this prolapse condition, which usually occurs after menopause, childbirth or a hysterectomy. The vaginal mesh was also used by many doctors to treat a severe form of urinary incontinence, called stress incontinence.

Gross, a nurse, filed her lawsuit after having surgery in 2006 to install a Gyncare Prolift for pelvic prolapse. She alleged the surgery led to a variety of problems, including mesh erosion, scar tissue, inflammation and “neurologic compromise to … structures and tissue.”

She said she had to seek medical treatment and had 18 operations to repair the damage caused by the mesh.

Ben Anderson, a member of the trail team for the plaintiff, called the jury verdict “a strong statement to Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon that they cannot put profits before women’s safety.”

The verdict, by a panel of six women and three men, followed a six-week trial before Judge Carol Higbee. After the verdict was delivered, the judge ruled that she will allow arguments on punitive damages. Those hearings are scheduled for Tuesday at 9:30 a.m.

Sheri Woodruff, a spokeswoman for Ethicon, said, “While we are always concerned when a patient experiences medical conditions like those suffered by the plaintiff, all surgeries for pelvic organ prolapse present risks of complications.”

She said she could not comment further.

In addition to the lawsuits against Ethicon and J&J in New Jersey, about 11,000 other claims have been filed against a variety of manufacturers of vaginal mesh, according to Florida attorney Bryan Aylstock.

Those claims have been consolidated into five cases that are pending in federal court in West Virginia, according to Aylstock, co-lead counsel in one of the West Virginia cases.

The defendants in those cases are Ethicon, C.R. Bard Inc, Boston Scientific Corp, Coloplast, and Endo Health Solutions’ American Medical Systems Inc.

Last year, jurors in a state court in Bakersfield, California, said C.R. Bard was liable for $3.6 million in the first case over the vaginal mesh devices to go to trial. The panel found the plaintiff and her husband were entitled to a total of $5.5 million for her medical expenses, pain, suffering and other damages resulting from Bard’s Avaulta Plus device.

Last June, J&J announced that it had stopped selling the vaginal mesh following lawsuits that allege it caused infections and bleeding. On Monday, the company said there were 4,000 lawsuits against J&J involving the vaginal mesh product pending in the United States.

Morningstar analyst Damien Conover said plaintiff attorneys generally pick a particularly strong case to argue first and that the judgment against J&J was sizable. But, he added that subsequent plaintiffs’ cases coming to trial might be less forceful, and that J&J, with annual revenue approaching $70 billion, could easily withstand eventual financial hits from the litigation.

“The size of the caseload presents a significant legal risk to J&J, although it’s hard to quantify,” Conover said.

Conover said J&J has taken recent charges of more than $4 billion for recalls of defective artificial hips, without badly denting the company’s share price. He said charges are likely to be considerably less for the vaginal mesh litigation, “So I don’t think this is a big overhang” for the company.

J&J shares closed down 0.89 percent, or 68 cents, at $75.57 on the New York Stock Exchange.

The lawyers of the firm Taylor Martino are ready to evaluate your claim and assist you in seeking compensation for your pain, suffering, and other physical injuries, the cost of restorative surgery as well as other financial difficulties, resulting from injuries caused by these defective products. Please call us for a free consultation and case evaluation.

* Gross v. Gynecare Inc., Superior Court of Atlantic County, New Jersey, Atl-L-6966-10.

Related Posts

Leave a Reply

Recent Articles

The Role of Negligence in Alabama Personal Injury Law
November 1, 2024
Riding Safely: Navigating Motorcycle Accidents in Mobile, AL
October 16, 2024
How Long Do You Have to File a Personal Injury Claim in Alabama?
October 7, 2024
Johnny Smith
Johnny Smith
21:19 10 Feb 22
When I met Ed Rowan, my family and I were in a dispute with a very large and nationally recognized company. From the start, I could tell we were in good hands. His immediate grasp of the case, including the most minute details was refreshing. Within a few weeks, I found that skill and a good memory were only two of Ed’s attributes. He is also honest, hardworking, and extremely motivated to win. The successful resolution of our case far exceeded my expectations. Ed Rowan has proved himself to me. He will be my first call for any legal issues I have in the future.
Noelle L.
Noelle L.
22:11 23 Jan 22
My family and I had a very positive experience with this law firm. Our attorney worked so hard on our behalf. We were extremely happy with the outcome. I would highly recommend this firm to others that are looking for help. Thank you for making this a positive experience for us. We had other things to worry about. This firm took our legal worries away. Thank you, again, for your service.
Jordan Davis
Jordan Davis
13:24 20 Aug 19
Love the whole legal team at Taylor Martino. They truly care about their clients. Would not go to any another Injury Lawyer in Alabama!
Kiyyah Malik
Kiyyah Malik
19:09 13 Jun 19
Ben Kearns and the staff at Taylor Martino made a terrible situation (car accident) into a much simpler less stressful process. I appreciate all the dedication and hard work. They are highly recommended in my book!
Shadow Yuuki
Shadow Yuuki
20:04 22 May 19
These guys are the best. If anyone needs a lawyer, they did what they said they where going to do and when they said they going to do it i got everything i should have. They are the best lawyers in Mobile
Rachel
Rachel
21:34 20 May 19
I heard about Ed Rowan from my aunt and gave him a call. Ed Rowan got things done in a timely matter and Elizabeth Wright was very helpful and quick to respond when I had any questions.
Tim Howard
Tim Howard
15:11 23 Sep 18
I highly recommend the firm as they took my case and settled it quickly. They took me in and treated me like family from day one. They kept me informed throughout the process and never left me feeling uncomfortable. Ben and Jennifer went above and beyond what anyone would expect.
sree harsha sunkara
sree harsha sunkara
15:14 13 Apr 18
This was the best law firm I have ever experienced. All I did was just contacted them and they did the rest for me and updated me every week about the work in process. They were so good and I highly recommend them in case of any accidents
Alice Dobson
Alice Dobson
12:17 19 Oct 17
No one ever wants to find themselves in need of an attorney, however, if needed you should contact Taylor Martino. They all worked very hard on my case and got me a much bigger settlement than I ever expected. I hope to never be in need of a lawyer again but if I do, I'll be calling them.
Laura V
Laura V
03:09 13 Oct 17
I had a family member use this firm a couple months ago and dealt with Richard Taylor. He was very professional and compassionate. He went above and beyond to make sure my family was informed and felt confident in their situation. I would recommend this firm to anyone!
debra hadley
debra hadley
02:49 15 Dec 15
Ed Rowan was very knowledgeable, professional and truly cared about my case. He was diligent in pursuing my case as if I was his only client. He kept me informed from the beginning to end and was always willing to listen and answer my questions.Give him a call he is excellent.
More reviews
js_loader